GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007001032

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Pending Cases

Case C-718/21, Miscellaneous

LG – v – Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa, reference lodged by the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) on 26 November 2021

Keywords Miscellaneous
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-718/21, Miscellaneous", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2022):69-69

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      1. Does the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union preclude a provision of national law such as the first sentence of Article 69(1b) of the Ustawa z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. – Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych (Law of 27 July 2001 on the System of Ordinary Courts; … Dz, U. of 2020, item 2072), which makes the effectiveness of a declaration by a judge of his or her intention to continue to hold a judicial office after reaching retirement age subject to the consent of another body?

      2. Does the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union preclude the adoption of an interpretation of a national provision under which a judge’s belated declaration of his or her intention to continue to hold a judicial office after reaching retirement age is ineffective, irrespective of the reason for the failure to observe the time limit and the significance of that failure for the proceedings concerning consent to his or her continuing to hold a judicial office?


Print this article