GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

Search articles of European Employment Law Cases
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006004018

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open
Pending Cases

Case C-560/21, Privacy

ZS – v – Zweckverband ‘Kommunale Informationsverarbeitung Sachsen’ KISA, a body governed by public law, reference lodged by the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) on 13 September 2021
Keywords Privacy
DOI 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006004018
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-560/21, Privacy", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2021):228-228
Download RIS Download BibTex

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      1. Is the second sentence of Article 38(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the General Data Protection Regulation; ‘the GDPR’) to be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law, such as, in the present case, the first sentence of Paragraph 6(4) of the Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (Federal Law on data protection), which makes dismissal of the data protection officer by the controller, who is his or her employer, subject to the conditions set out therein, irrespective of whether such dismissal relates to the performance of his or her tasks?

      2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: 2Does the second sentence of Article 38(3) of the GDPR have a sufficient legal basis, in particular in so far as the provision covers data protection officers who have an employment relationship with the controller?


Print this article