Can the concept of a person ‘employed principally in the territory of the Member State in which he resides’ contained in Article 14(2)(a)(ii) [of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, as amended] be interpreted in the same way as that which (concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters, jurisdiction and individual contracts of employment (Regulation (EC) No 44/2001)) Article 19(2)(a) [of the latter Regulation] defines as the ‘place where the employee habitually carries out his work’, including in the aviation and airline crew sector (Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91), as expressed in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union referred to in the grounds?
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006003038
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| Pending Cases | Case C-380/21, Social InsuranceIstituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) – v – Ryanair DAC, reference lodged by the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) on 18 January 2021 |
| Keywords | Social Insurance |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006003038 |
|
Show PDF Show fullscreen Statistics Citation |
| This article has been viewed times. |
| This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "Case C-380/21, Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2021):194-194
, "Case C-380/21, Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2021):194-194