-
Question
Must Article 3(b)(i) and Article 7(1) of Directive 2011/24, read in combination with Article 1(c) and Article 2 of Regulation No 883/2004, be interpreted as meaning that a person in receipt of a pension under the legislation of a Member State, who has a right, under Article 24 of that regulation, to the benefits in kind provided by the Member State of his or her residence at the expense of the Member State responsible for paying his or her pension, must be regarded as an ‘insured person’, within the meaning of Article 7(1) of that directive, who is able to obtain reimbursement of the costs of the healthcare that he or she has received in a third Member State, without being affiliated to the compulsory sickness insurance scheme of the Member State responsible for paying his or her pension?
-
Ruling
Article 3(b)(i) and Article 7(1) of Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare, read in combination with Article 1(c) and Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 988/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that the person in receipt of a pension under the legislation of a Member State, who has a right, under Article 24 of that regulation, as amended, to the benefits in kind provided by the Member State of his or her residence at the expense of the Member State responsible for paying his or her pension, must be regarded as an ‘insured person’, within the meaning of Article 7(1) of that directive, who is able to obtain reimbursement of the costs of the cross-border healthcare that he or she has received in a third Member State, without being affiliated to the compulsory sickness insurance scheme of the Member State responsible for paying his or her pension.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006003031
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| Rulings | ECJ 28 October 2021, case C-636/19 (CAK), Social InsuranceY – v – Centraal Administratie Kantoor, Dutch case |
| Keywords | Social Insurance |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006003031 |
|
Show PDF Show fullscreen Abstract Statistics Citation |
| This article has been viewed times. |
| This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 28 October 2021, case C-636/19 (CAK), Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2021):191-191
, "ECJ 28 October 2021, case C-636/19 (CAK), Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2021):191-191
|
|
Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in
Contents