-
Summary
An insured person is entitled to a full cost reimbursement for an allowed medical treatment in the Member State, if the initial medical advice in the Member State led to permission for a medical treatment which differed from the eventual treatment following a second – and better – medical advice in the Member State where he underwent the medical treatment, if there was no time to obtain permission for that second treatment. Unfortunately, no English version of the case is available yet.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006003029
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| Rulings | ECJ 6 October 2021, case C-538/19 (Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate en Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanţa), Social InsuranceTS, UT, VU – v – Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate and Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanţa, Romanian case |
| Keywords | Social Insurance |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006003029 |
|
Show PDF Show fullscreen Abstract Statistics Citation |
| This article has been viewed times. |
| This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 6 October 2021, case C-538/19 (Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate en Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanţa), Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2021):190-190
, "ECJ 6 October 2021, case C-538/19 (Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate en Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanţa), Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2021):190-190
|
An insured person is entitled to a full cost reimbursement for an allowed medical treatment in the Member State, if the initial medical advice in the Member State led to permission for a medical treatment which differed from the eventual treatment following a second – and better – medical advice in the Member State where he underwent the medical treatment, if there was no time to obtain permission for that second treatment. |