Must Article 24 of Directive 2004/38/EC and Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which a national of another Member State, who establishes a permanent residence or habitual residence in the Member State concerned and does not prove that he has national income from agriculture and forestry, business, employment or self-employment, has no entitlement to family benefits within the meaning of Article 3(1)(j) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, in conjunction with Article 1(z) thereof, for the first three months of establishing a permanent residence or habitual residence, whilst a national of the Member State concerned, who is in the same situation, does have an entitlement to family benefits within the meaning of Article 3(1)(j) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, in conjunction with Article 1(z) thereof, without proving national income from agriculture and forestry, business, employment or self-employment?
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005004032
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| Pending Cases | Case C-411/20, Free Movement, Social InsuranceS – v – Familienkasse Niedersachsen-Bremen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit, reference lodged by the Finanzgericht Bremen (Germany) on 2 September 2020 |
| Keywords | Free Movement, Social Insurance |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005004032 |
|
Show PDF Show fullscreen Statistics Citation |
| This article has been viewed times. |
| This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "Case C-411/20, Free Movement, Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2020):287-287
, "Case C-411/20, Free Movement, Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2020):287-287