Can a provision like Article 60(4) of the General Law on Social Security (Ley General de la Seguridad Social), which excludes the maternity supplement for women who retire [early] voluntarily, as opposed to those who retire, also voluntarily, at the normal age provided for, or who retire early but on the basis of work performed throughout their working lives, by reason [of] disability, or because they ceased employment before taking retirement through no fault of their own, be considered to constitute direct discrimination for the purposes of Directive 79/7?
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005002043
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| Pending Cases | Case C-130/20, Gender Discrimination, PensionYJ – v – Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), reference lodged by the Juzgado de lo Social n.º3 de Barcelona (Spain) on 9 March 2020 |
| Keywords | Gender Discrimination, Pension |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005002043 |
|
Show PDF Show fullscreen Statistics Citation |
| This article has been viewed times. |
| This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "Case C-130/20, Gender Discrimination, Pension", European Employment Law Cases, 2, (2020):143-143
, "Case C-130/20, Gender Discrimination, Pension", European Employment Law Cases, 2, (2020):143-143