No English translation of the judgment has been provided yet. Once an English translation has been made available, a summary will be provided on www.eelc-online.com. For now, the official case information is available on: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0830.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005002020
European Employment Law Cases |
|
Rulings | ECJ 2 April 2020, case C-830/18 (Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße), Free MovementLandkreis Südliche Weinstraße – v – PF and others, German case |
Keywords | Free Movement |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005002020 |
Show PDF Show fullscreen Abstract Statistics Citation |
This article has been viewed times. |
This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 2 April 2020, case C-830/18 (Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße), Free Movement", European Employment Law Cases, 2, (2020):132-132
, "ECJ 2 April 2020, case C-830/18 (Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße), Free Movement", European Employment Law Cases, 2, (2020):132-132
Within the context of Article 7(2) of Regulation 492/2011/EU, legislation which provides for reimbursement of costs of school transport on the condition that the recipient lives in a federal state constitutes indirect discrimination, as it puts frontier workers on a disadvantage compared to workers living in that member state. Practical difficulties connected to an efficient organisation of this school transport are not imperative reasons of public interest which justify such indirect discrimination. |