GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005002020

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Rulings

ECJ 2 April 2020, case C-830/18 (Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße), Free Movement

Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße – v – PF and others, German case

Keywords Free Movement
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Abstract Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 2 April 2020, case C-830/18 (Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße), Free Movement", European Employment Law Cases, 2, (2020):132-132

    Within the context of Article 7(2) of Regulation 492/2011/EU, legislation which provides for reimbursement of costs of school transport on the condition that the recipient lives in a federal state constitutes indirect discrimination, as it puts frontier workers on a disadvantage compared to workers living in that member state. Practical difficulties connected to an efficient organisation of this school transport are not imperative reasons of public interest which justify such indirect discrimination.

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in


Print this article