OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises are the most comprehensive international public standard on all areas of CSR with 46 adherent governments. The unique feature of the Guidelines is its grievance mechanism. The National Contact Points for the OECD Guidelines serve as a complaints and problem solving mechanism for trade unions and NGO’s related to for example human rights and labor standards. Since 2011 the Guidelines apply not only to investments but also to global supply chains. The concept of CSR Due Diligence in the supply chains is now a key pillar of CSR. |
The Dovenschmidt Quarterly
About this journalSubscribe to the email alerts for this journal here to receive notifications when a new issue is at your disposal.
Editorial |
Guest Editorial |
Authors | Jan Eijsbouts |
Author's information |
Article |
Business and Human RightsThe Next Chapter |
Authors | John G. Ruggie |
Author's information |
Article |
The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business ConductSoft Law with Hard Consequences |
Keywords | Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Business Conduct, Supply chain responsibility, Labor standards, Human rights |
Authors | Roel Nieuwenkamp |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
Business Enterprises and the EnvironmentCorporate Environmental Responsibility |
Keywords | Corporate Environmental Responsibility, Environmental Due Diligence, Environmental CSR, Business enterprises and the environment, Environmental complement to Ruggie Framework |
Authors | Katinka D. Jesse and Erik V. Koppe |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In 2011, following his 2005 initial mandate of the UN Commission on Human Rights and his extended 2008 mandate of the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on the issues of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, Professor John Ruggie, issued the final text of the ‘Guiding Principles for the Implementation of the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework”‘. The 2008 Framework on Business and Human Rights and the complementing 2011 Guiding Principles consist of three pillars: the duty of states to protect human rights, the responsibility of business enterprises to respect human rights, and access to remedies for victims of human rights abuses. They currently qualify as the dominant paradigm in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse, also because they now form part of various soft law and self-regulation initiatives. The Framework and Guiding Principles do not, however, specifically focus on environmental issues, but their systematic approach and structure do provide a model to address state duties and business responsibilities to care of the environment. This article is intended to complement the UN Framework and Guiding Principles on business and human rights with principles in the field of business and the environment. Hence, it is submitted that states have a customary duty to care for the environment; it is similarly submitted that business enterprises have a responsibility to care for the environment; and it is submitted that stakeholders must have access to remedies in relation to breaches of these duties and responsibilities. |
Article |
Assessing the Effectiveness of Remedy Outcomes of Non-judicial Grievance Mechanisms |
Authors | Martijn Scheltema |
Author's information |
Article |
Better Access to Remedy in Company-Community Conflicts in the Field of CSRA Model for Company-Based Grievance Mechanisms |
Keywords | CSR, human rights, grievance mechanism, interest-based approach, rights-based approach |
Authors | Cristina Cedillo |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Special Representative to the UN Secretary-General on human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, establishes access to remedy as one of the three pillars of the UN ‘Protect, Respect, Remedy’ Framework. In this Framework, Ruggie prescribes that company-based grievance mechanisms can be one effective means of enabling remediation to those potentially being impacted by business enterprises’ activities. This report proposes a model for company-based grievance mechanisms that follow a combination of interest-based and rights-compatible approaches to conflict resolution of all corporate social responsibility issues in company–stakeholder relationships. |