Res Publica |
|
Article | Besluitvorming inzake buitenlandse politiek |
Authors | Peter R. Baehr |
DOI | 10.5553/RP/048647001987029001005 |
Show PDF Abstract Statistics Citation |
This article has been viewed times. |
This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Peter R. Baehr, "Besluitvorming inzake buitenlandse politiek", Res Publica, 1, (1987):5-19
In foreign policy-making there exists a tension between what the executive is prepared to do and what parliament or public interest groups would want it to do. A recent study of domestic pressure on foreignpolicy-making in the Netherlands has shown that there exists a close connection between the success of public interest groups in changing foreign policy behavior and their ability to mobilize parliamentary support for their efforts. That study, entitled Controversies at Home, was based on the results of 16 case-studies of recent controversial foreign policy decisions. Foreign ministries aften use the need for secrecy, coherence and consistency as arguments to resist change. The role of the national parliament in foreign policy-making deserves to be strengthened. In this respect some of the experiences of the United States Congress could be applied to parliaments in other countries. The possibilities are discussed with specific reference to the situation in the Netherlands. |