European Journal of Policing Studies

Article

Colouring or Changing the Belgian Police?

About Faces and Ways of Policing

Keywords Police organization, migrants, integration, community policing
Authors Sybille Smeets en Carrol Tange
DOI
Author's information

Sybille Smeets
Sybille Smeets is researcher at the Centre of criminological researches and Professor at the School of Criminology at the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB). She has a Doctorate in Criminology and a Master Degree in Political Sciences. Her main research topics include police function, policing, local prevention policies in Belgium and Europe and the links between security policies and Welfare State (corresp.: ssmeets@ulb.ac.be).

Carrol Tange
Carrol Tange has graduated in criminology and philosophy. He is researcher at the National Institute of Criminalistics and Criminology (NICC) and assistant at the School of Criminology of the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) regarding criminal policy matters. His main research domains are the implementation and evaluation of public safety policies, pretrial instruction and detention practices, as well as the everyday field work of frontline officers and the impact of the development of management in justice and police organizations (corresp.: catange@ulb.ac.be).
  • Abstract

      In this paper, produced in the framework of an internal seminar regarding the place of migrants in the police, for the first time the available knowledge regarding the inclusion of ‘migrants’ in the police forces in Belgium is assessed through a review of political, scientific and professional sources. The analysis encompasses the terms used to describe this population, for example as ‘new Belgians’, the evolution of the context and the motives given since the nineties to the development of initiatives aimed at increasing the presence of those particular citizens amongst police forces, as well as the debates on those issues. The presentation of the concrete modalities of this integration, based on the previously stated knowledge and its obvious limitations, focuses on the known outcomes of those initiatives and the gap between what is said and what is done. It is therefore a first step towards a better understanding of a recurrent issue. As such, it might contribute to further debates, whether in the political or the professional fields.

Please sign in to access the article



Did you receive an activation code but no access yet? Please activate your code here.

Forgot your password? Request new password.

Purchase access

You can purchase online access to this article. You will receive 24 hrs access @ € 17,50 (excl. VAT).

24 hrs access € 17,50 (excl. VAT)

Activate your code

If you have an access code, please activate it here.