Res Publica |
|
Article | Opkomstplicht: stimulans of frustratie?Een landenvergelijkende studie naar de gevolgen van opkomstplicht op politieke participatie |
Keywords | compulsory voting, political participation, turnout, elections |
Authors | Tom van der Meer en Jan van Deth |
DOI | 10.5553/RP/048647002010052001005 |
Show PDF Abstract Author's information Statistics Citation Citations (4) |
This article has been viewed times. |
This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Tom van der Meer and Jan van Deth, "Opkomstplicht: stimulans of frustratie?", Res Publica, 1, (2010):73-93
Compulsory voting does not only increase voting turnout; it is also expected to have positive spill-over effects. Supposedly, citizens who are obliged to cast a vote will be more engaged in politics than citizens who are allowed to avoid politics. This article reviews the main arguments for this expectation. A rival expectation is formulated based on the idea that enforcements, duties and sanctions are likely to decrease the willingness of citizens to participate politically. A cross-national multi-level empirical test – covering turnout and political participation in twenty established democracies – shows that compulsory voting indeed increases voting turnout. Yet neither positive nor negative spill-over effects for other modes of political participation can be detected. Apparently, the consequences of compulsory voting are restricted to turnout. |
Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in
- Sofie Hennau and Johan Ackaert, "Compulsory Voting and Voter Turnout in the Low Countries" (Politics of the Low Countries, aflevering 3 2022)