GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/RP/048647001989031004527

Res PublicaAccess_open

Article

Het strijdpunt als besluitvormingstype in de Belgische politiek

Authors
DOI
Show PDF
Abstract Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
Wilfried Dewachter, "Het strijdpunt als besluitvormingstype in de Belgische politiek", Res Publica, 4, (1989):527-550

    Within the Belgian political system political issues are hard to deal with. The institutions do not provide a problem-solving mechanism: no referendum, no direct election of a one-party cabinet. Moreover, electoral campaigns usually involve a lot of heterogeneous issues and almost never focus upon a single one. Active political participation of citizens is, by definition, selective and, compared with electoral participation, limited, although, the number of people taking part in a political demonstration is sometimes considerable. An investigation of the Belgian political elite shows that active political participation, sparked off by a single issue, can be considered as one of the most polyarchie types of political decision-making in Belgium. This involves an increase of tension and conflict, a slowing down of the process of decision-making and a selective accessibility to this type of participation. Belgian politicians try to avoid these difficulties by either opting for non-decision or consociational politics.

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in


Print this article