GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

Search articles of European Employment Law Cases
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006004023

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open
Pending Cases

Case C-680/21, Free Movement

UL, SA Royal Antwerp Football Club – v – Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL, reference lodged by the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) on 11 November 2021
Keywords Free Movement
DOI 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006004023
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-680/21, Free Movement", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2021):230-230
Download RIS Download BibTex

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      1. Is Article 101 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding the plan relating to “HGPs” adopted on 2 February 2005 by UEFA’s Executive Committee, approved by UEFA’s 52 member associations at the Tallinn Congress on 21 April 2005 and implemented by means of regulations adopted both by UEFA and by its member federations?

      2. Are Articles 45 and 101 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding the application of the rules on the inclusion on the match sheet and the fielding of locally trained players, as formalised by Articles P335.11 and P.1422 of the URBSFA’s federal regulation and reproduced in Articles B4.1[12] of Title 4 and B6.109 of Title 6 of the new URBSFA regulation?


Print this article